Corrections Corporation of America | Levi & Korsinsky, LLP | Securities Private prisons do not save substantially on costs; and as noted in a recent report by the Departments Office of Inspector General, they do not maintain the same level of safety and security.. 2. Bell, Esq.) (888) 299-7706 They, however, came as a shock to the stock market. CCA shareholders who purchased securities during the Class Period may, no later than October 24, 2016, seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff of the class. Donations: 212-614-6448 authorizing us to contact you regarding this case and/or future cases. On August 9, 2013, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally approved new rules capping prison phone rates, ten years after Martha Wright filed her petition. The class action investors who filed the suit are primarily hedge funds, union pension funds and other institutional investors looking to turn a buck on mass incarceration. Check, Esq., D. Seamus Kaskela, Esq. Although the information on this website is intended to assist you, it does not replace the information contained in the Notice and Stipulation, both of which can be found and downloaded by clicking on the Case Documents tab above. While Corrections Corporation of America still has a number of contracts with the DOJ that have yet to expire, the decision had a massive negative impact on the companys stock prices, which began reeling more or less immediately after the announcement. Lawsuits are now being filed on behalf of Elmiron patients who suffered permanent retinal injuries and seek to recover money for physical and mental anguish, medical expenses and more. You will not be charged for these lawyers. In this lawsuit, plaintiffs alleged that unconscionable phone arrangements established by the Corrections Corporation of America and various telephone companies violated their constitutional rights. 7th Floor Check, Esq.D. When typing in this field, a list of search results will appear and be automatically updated as you type. Before commenting, please review our comment policy. The complaint alleges that the Company made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose: (a) that Corrections . Plaintiffs Consolidated Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (the Complaint), filed on March 13, 2017, alleges that Defendants violated 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As more fully described in the Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action(the "Notice"), the initial complaint in this action was filed on August 23, 2016. D. Seamus Kaskela, Esq. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. Fax: 212-614-6499, CCR filed a petition for rulemaking with the FCC. . Wedbush Cuts Price Target on CoreCivic to $15 From $17, Citing Cash Flow Forecasts, Kee.. Wells Fargo Upgrades CoreCivic to Outperform from Neutral, Sets $17 Price Target. RADNOR, PA / ACCESSWIRE / August 29, 2016 / The law firm of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP alerts Corrections Corporation of America (NYSE: CXW) ("CCA" or the "Company") shareholders that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the Middle District of Tennessee on behalf of purchasers of the Company's securities between February PLN managing editor Alex Friedmann, who owns a small amount of CoreCivic stock as an activist investor, mainly for the purpose of filing shareholder resolutions, has filed a separate derivative suit against CoreCivic that was stayed pending developments in the Grae case, which remains pending. or Adrienne O. CCA entered into a series of exclusive agreements with telephone companies to provide inmate telephone service at various CCA-run prisons and jails. Any information you The only way to be eligible to receive a payment from the Settlement. CoreCivic, Inc., formerly Corrections Corporation of America, is the defendant proposed class action filed over alleged human trafficking and labor law violations. Corrections Corporation of America Securities Fraud Class Action | New The class and CoreCivic agreed on April 15, 2021 to settle the lawsuit for $56 million, which includes attorney fees and costs. Remember Or log in with Google Twitter Facebook Apple Sign up of Phillips ADR, an experienced mediator. The class action suit has a class period of between Feb. 27, 2012, and Aug. 17, 2016. The effect on stock prices 3:16-cv-02267 Honorable Aleta A. Trauger . New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox. The complaint alleges that CCA and certain of its executive officers made a series of false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose to investors during the Class Period that: (i) CCA's facilities lacked adequate safety and security standards and were less efficient at offering correctional services than the Federal Bureau of Prisons' ("BOP") facilities; (ii) CCA's rehabilitative services for inmates were less effective than those provided by BOP; (iii) consequently, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") was unlikely to renew and/or extend its contracts with CCA; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, CCA's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. GLOBALLY RECOGNIZED ROSEN LAW FIRM Encourages Credit Acceptance (M.D. Investors who purchased CCA securities during the Class Period may seek to be appointed by the Court as a lead plaintiff representative of the class. The petition sought restructuring of long distance inmate calling services to introduce competition. The capitalized terms used on this website, and not otherwise defined, shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the. at (484) 270-1453; or you may submit your information via email at info@ktmc.com, or you may click here to print a PDF of this form. CCA/CoreCivic Securities Settlement Corrections Corp Of America | shareholdersfoundation.com RADNOR, Pa., Aug. 24, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- The law firm of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP announces that a shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against Corrections Corporation of America (NYSE: CXW) ("CCA" or the "Company") on behalf of purchasers of the Company's securities between February 27, 2012 and August 17, 2016, inclusive (the "Class Period"). Class Action Says Bank of America Unlawfully Withholds Cash Rewards He emphasized that CoreCivic believed the allegations in the lawsuit were without merit.. The firm represents investors, consumers and whistleblowers (private citizens who report fraudulent practices against the government and share in the recovery of government dollars). The Settling Parties engaged in good faith negotiations, but did not reach a settlement. Corrections Corporation of America is a civil rights case which challenged the monopolies that phone companies and the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) maintain in the prison systems of the United States. later than October 24, 2016, petition the Court to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class through Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check or other counsel, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation. Families, South Carolina Fails to Evacuate Prisoners Threatened by Hurricane, New York Sheriff Loses Lawsuit, Must Report Serious Prisoner Incidents to State Agency, South Carolina: Two Women Drown in Sheriffs Transport Van, Deputies Charged, New Mexico Riot Raises Questions About Private Prison Companys Competence, New Indianapolis Jail Will Not be Run by a Private Prison Company, but is Being Built on Contaminated Land, GEO Group Produces Litigation Documents After HRDC Files Public Records Suit, Imagine Pleading Guilty Because You Cant Afford to Call Your Lawyer, Canada: Long-Term Segregation of Mentally Ill Prisoners Unconstitutional; $20 Million in Damages, Federal Court Rules in Favor of HRDC in Virginia Jail Censorship Suit, Settlement Reached in Suit Over Failure to Keep Released L.A. County Prisoners from Becoming Homeless, I Had Nothing: How Parole Perpetuates a Cycle of Incarceration and Instability, Sixth Circuit Rules Suit May Proceed Where State Judge Offered Reduced Sentences for Sterilization, The Second Step: Invest in Prison Education Programs, Reinstate Pell Grants, Virginia Supreme Court Upholds Derivative Sovereign Immunity for Jail Physician, Fifth Circuit: No Qualified Immunity for Mississippi Sheriffs in Suit Over Mentally Ill Mans Years-long Unlawful Detention, Federal Judge Refuses to Shorten Corruption Sentence for Former Head of New York City Jail Guards Union, Fifth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity to Mississippi Cops Who Let Injured Hemophiliac Bleed Out in Jail, Sixth Circuit: Unarmed Bank Robber Who Ordered Tellers to Get on the Floor Not Subject to Enhancement for Physical Restraint, Music Stops in Fifth Circuits Qualified Immunity Dance, Leaving Plaintiffs With Shortened Discovery Period, Fifth Circuit Holds PLRAs Three-Strikes Provision Does Not Apply to Actions Removed From State Court, Plainly Grossly Inadequate: Federal Court Finds Arizona Prison Healthcare Deliberately Indifferent to Prisoners Risk of Serious Harm, Eighth Circuit Says Judge Dismissing Claim of Federal Prisoner in Arkansas Was Premature in Counting It a PLRA Strike, After Federal Judge Censors Lawyers Tweets About CoreCivic, Company Settles Suit Over Tennessee Prisoners Murder by Cellmate, Class Certified in Orange Crush Shakedown Lawsuit by Illinois Prisoners, ICE Ignores Inspector Generals Call for Immediate Removal of Migrant Detainees from CoreCivic New Mexico Detention Facility, CoreCivic Workers Unionize and Go On Strike at Arizona Prison, Arizona Closing Prison, Moving Prisoners to CoreCivic Lockup, GED Cheating Scheme Uncovered at Montana CoreCivic Prison, Class of Juvenile Prisoners Certified in Suit Against Florida DOC, Federal Judge Allows Wiretapping Case to Proceed Against CoreCivic for Recording Attorney-Client Conversations at Nevada Prison, $405,000 Paid to Prisoner Disabled and Left Untreated at LaSalle-Managed Louisiana Jails, U.S.D.C. Lawsuit Filed, Settlement Proposed, Settlement Approved. The complaint alleges that CCA and certain of its executive officers made a series of false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose to investors during the Class Period that: (i) CCA's facilities lacked adequate safety and security standards and were less efficient at offering correctional services than the Federal Bureau of Prisons' ("BOP") facilities; (ii) CCA's rehabilitative services for inmates were less effective than those provided by BOP; (iii) consequently, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") was unlikely to renew and/or extend its contracts with CCA; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, CCA's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. In 2014 and 2015 reports, CCA said, We are committed to equipping offenders in our care with the services, support, and resources necessary to return the community as productive, contributing members of society., The facade fell off on August 18, 2016, when Deputy General Attorney Sally Yates announced the Department of Justice had decided to end its use of private prisons. On August 23, 2016, an action captioned , Grae v. Corrections Corporation of America, et al. Sections 1 et seq., the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. Sections 151 et seq., and other laws of the District of Columbia. This website has been established to provide general information related to the proposed settlement of the case entitledGrae v. Corrections Corporation of America, et al., Civil Action No. Share Tennessee: Federal Court Grants Class-Action Status in Shareholder Suit On Aug. 17, the day before the DOJ announcement, Correction Corporation was trading at just $27.22 per share. Please download the PDF to view it: Download PDF. RADNOR, PA / ACCESSWIRE / August 29, 2016 / The law firm of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP alerts Corrections Corporation of America shareholders that a class action lawsuit has been filed. For more information on this case or other class action litigations, please contact Adam Foulke at 203-987-4949 or info@battea.com. CCA, together with its subsidiaries, owns, operates, and manages private prisons and other correctional facilities in the United States, and provides inmate residential and prisoner transportation. 3:16-cv-02267; 2019 U.S. Dist. Shareholders who have incurred losses in Corrections Corporation of America securities are urged to contact the firm immediately at classmember@whafh.com or (800) 575-0735 or (212) 545-4774.. Bell, Esq.) The complaint alleges that CCA and certain of its executive officers made a series of false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose to investors during the Class Period that: (i) CCA's facilities lacked adequate safety and security standards and were less efficient at offering correctional services than the Federal Bureau of Prisons' ("BOP") facilities; (ii) CCA's rehabilitative services for inmates were less effective than those provided by BOP; (iii) consequently, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") was unlikely to renew and/or extend its contracts with CCA; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, CCA's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. CoreCivic, Inc., formerly known as Corrections Corporation of America, is the defendant in a 36-page proposed class action lawsuit alleging the company operates its detention facilities in violation of state and federal human trafficking and labor laws. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT, , Civil Action No. Ordering the federal officials to not renew private prison contracts was one of the first acts President Biden made upon taking office. At its core, the lawsuit takes issue with the entire for-profit detention system into which many undocumented immigrants are thrown into to face removal proceedings. 07/28/2021. You will, however, still be a Member of the Class, which means that you give up your right to ever be part of any other lawsuit against the Defendants or any other Released Defendant Parties about the legal claims being resolved by this Settlement and you will be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court in the Litigation. Sections 151 et seq., and other laws of the District of Columbia. the plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit moved to sever their case from the monetary claims. Are you a current or former employee of Corrections Corporation of America (2016)? The submission of this form does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor an obligation on For two years, CCR participated in a mediation process with defendants and the Special Enforcement unit of the FCC as required. In short, the defendants profited from their unfair control over imprisoned people. | November 22, 2022 New York, NY 10012, Main: 212-614-6464 On February 28, 2019, the Settling Parties participated in a voluntary confidential mediation with Gregory Lindstrom, Esq. On some level it seems as though Wall Street had expected a downturn to come in this regard. Ms. Wright was present for the announcement along with other family members of prisoners, advocates and other allies. See: Grae v. Corrections Corporation of America, U.S.D.C. A 2012 report noted that 40-43% of CCAs revenue was derived from contracts with the federal government through operation of prisons and detention centers. Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check is a driving force behind corporate governance reform, and has recovered billions of dollars on behalf of institutional and individual investors from the United States and around the world. Corrado Rizzi is the Senior Managing Editor of ClassAction.org. Prison Staff Are Refusing Vaccines. LEXIS 50444. by Matt Clarke On March 26, 2019, a federal district court in Tennessee granted class-action certification in a shareholder lawsuit brought against CoreCivic, formerly Corrections Corporation of America, that alleged the company made statements misrepresenting the quality and value of its services, resulting in losses to stockholders. Adrienne O. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision of whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. What Is This Lawsuit About? The plaintiffs allege the defendant threatened to punish detainees who refused to engage in tasks that the case claims included cleaning the entire facility, preparing meals for law enforcement events, clerical work, providing barber services, and preparing clothing for new inmates. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG), HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning), Machine Tools, Metalworking and Metallurgy, Aboriginal, First Nations & Native American, https://www.ktmc.com/new-cases/corrections-corporation-of-america#join, Final Deadline Approaching on March 7, 2023: Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Reminds Enovix Corporation Investors of Class Action Lawsuit Deadline, Lead Plaintiff Deadline on March 7, 2023 for Enovix Corporation Investors - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Reminds Investors of Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Enovix Corporation. Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLPDarren J. PDF Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action America, Inc. ("Cca" or They also alleged that the agreements violate the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. On August 22, 2001, District Judge Gladys Kessler acknowledged the civil rights concerns but referred the case to the Federal Communications Commission, under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction. Amalgamated Bank, as Trustee for the LongView Collective Investment Fund, sought to represent a class of investors who bought and sold CoreCivic stock between February 27, 2012 and August 17, 2016, including at least 783 major institutions and numerous minor institutions and private parties who owned the companys stock during that period. The lawsuit was filed August 23, 2016, on behalf of the class of stock holders of CoreCivic, which trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol CXW. The class consisted of persons who held CCA stock between February 27, 2012 and August 17, 2016. District Judge Gladys Kessler acknowledged the civil rights concerns, but referred the case to the Federal Communications Commission, under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction. $56 Million Settlement in CoreCivic Securities Violation Lawsuit Bell, Esq.280 King of Prussia RoadRadnor, PA 19087(888) 299 - 7706(610) 667 - 7706info@ktmc.com, To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/shareholder-class-action-filed-against-corrections-corporation-of-america--cxw-300317822.html, SOURCE Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP. Check, Esq., D. Seamus Kaskela, Esq. The lawsuit captioned Grae v. Corrections Corporation of America, et al., Case No. Bell, Esq.) The firm represents investors, consumers and whistleblowers (private citizens who report fraudulent practices against the government and share in the recovery of government dollars). 280 King of Prussia Road Incarcerated People Are Paying the Price. Ryan & Maniskas, LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Corrections Private prison operator CoreCivic, formerly known as Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), paid $56 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging it violated securities laws that resulted in a loss to stock holders. Forgot password ? Corrections Corp Of America (NYSE:CXW) Investor Securities Class Action Lawsuit 08/23/2016. CCR filed a petition for rulemaking with the FCC. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP: Jon Naji, Esq. Therefore, class-action status was granted. Shareholders who wish to discuss this action and their legal options are encouraged to contact Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (Darren J. As detailed in the complaint, on August 18, 2016, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates announced the DOJ's decision to end its use of private prisons, including those operated by CCA, after officials concluded that the facilities are both less safe and less effective at providing correctional services than those run by the federal government. The district court held that Amalgamated was entitled to the rebuttable presumption that it relied on the companys material public statements when making stock purchases.