editor decision started nature rejection

One's knowledge, images, and emotions regarding the past have an impact on future actions. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. Our subeditors send authors the edited text for approval before it is typeset. How, when, and why you should appeal an editor's decision - Cell [CDATA[> Others must fail.. If the reviewers wish to be named their names will appear in alphabetical order at the end of the paper in a statement as below: Any reviewers that wish to remain anonymous will be acknowledged using a slightly modified statement: If no reviewers agree to be named, we will still acknowledge their valuable service using the statement below: Nature makes decisions about submitted papers as rapidly as possible. How much time does the scientific journal 'Nature' take from - Quora If so, how close was it? Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Nature (journal) - Wikipedia resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. //--> - Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. on 07 Apr, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Disconnect between goals and daily tasksIs it me, or the industry? Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. Performance & security by Cloudflare. Authors and their institutions are advised to coordinate any of their own publicity with the Journals and Editorial press office by e-mail after their paper is accepted for publication. It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' If an author remains unsatisfied, he or she can write to the Editor, citing the manuscript reference number. What could this mean? Thank you for visiting nature.com. Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees.Nature welcomes authors' suggestions for suitable independent referees (with their contact details), but editors are free to decide themselves who to use as referees. Such figures can be particularly helpful to nonspecialist readers of cell, molecular and structural biology papers. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. And hope you hear from the journal soon! Bulk update symbol size units from mm to map units in rule-based symbology. If a paper was rejected because the authors failed to persuade the referees that they had excluded alternative interpretations, then new data or analyses are likely to be required for the appeal to have any chance of success. . Motivation: The total time it took for the manuscript to be rejected without being sent for review was too long, in our opinion (1 month). My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. What Is the Difference Between 'Man' And 'Son of Man' in Num 23:19? Reviews for "Nature" - Page 1 - SciRev Cactus Communications. the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Reviewing excellence - Boer - Creativity and Innovation Management Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. The finals started yesterday. //-->Manuscript rejection: A problem or an opportunity? Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. The SEC pay-to-play rule for investment advisers as it turns 12 volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. If a paper was considered insufficiently novel or interesting to merit high-profile publication, we are unlikely to reconsider simply because the authors disagree. You said the finals started tomorrow. LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), Nature Energy published in 2016, UNITED STATES. Directly from with editor, to decision under process. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. Short answer: the editor will continue to try and find other suitable reviewers, sending them invitations and waiting for replies. Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. Their role is to. Hello. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the . If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. v. t. e. Sovereignty generally refers to the supreme authority of a state or territory. Space in Nature is extremely limited, and so format requirements must be strictly observed, as advised by the editor handling the submission, and detailed in the manuscript formatting guide. If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Internet Explorer). Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. PRX editors make every effort to arrive at a clear decision on the disposition of a manuscript within a reasonable time. MDPI | The Editorial Process 117. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. The first thing to do when you get a rejection is to take a deep breath and consider your options. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14. Elsevier is currently publishing not only the time to 1st decision and publication but also the CiteScore, Impact Factor, and Acceptance rate of their journals. The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. We suggest that authors send proofs to co-authors for them to check, but request that changes among the co-authors are coordinated so that only one author communicates with Nature and only one set of corrections is sent. Nature Neuroscience Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. It only takes a minute to sign up. It has core editorial offices across the United States, continental Europe, and Asia under the international scientific publishing company Springer Nature. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) That's it . This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. response letterresubmit, 3. the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). 'We regret to inform you'that your scientific manuscripts will be The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal?